Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Rebuttal to Froese and Proelss ''Evaluation and legal assessment of certified seafood''

Empirical study
Journal article
Resource is over 5 years old

Published 14th August 2012 by Elsevier. Authored by Stern-Pirlot, A., Smith, A. D. M., Zimmermann, C., Sainsbury, K., Agnew, D. and Gutierrez, N.

Summary

This paper is a response to the Froese and Proelss study on MSC certified seafood. The paper re-analyse the results and find, for example, an incorrect definition of 'overfished'. This study used 45 fish stocks from MSC certified fisheries and used internationally accepted methods for determining 'overfishing' ocurred. The results show that none of the examined stock was overfished.
Research detail

Rebuttal to Froese and Proelss ''Evaluation and legal assessment of certified seafood''

Empirical study
Journal article

Published 14th August 2012 by Elsevier. Authored by Stern-Pirlot, A., Smith, A. D. M., Zimmermann, C., Sainsbury, K., Agnew, D. and Gutierrez, N.

We currently don't have the rights to host this resource on Evidensia.
Users are encouraged to access the resource through the publisher's website.