Rebuttal to Froese and Proelss ''Evaluation and legal assessment of certified seafood''

Empirical study
Journal article

Published 14th August 2012 by Elsevier. Authored by Stern-Pirlot, A., Smith, A. D. M., Zimmermann, C., Sainsbury, K., Agnew, D. and Gutierrez, N.

Summary

This paper is a response to the Froese and Proelss study on MSC certified seafood. The paper re-analyse the results and find, for example, an incorrect definition of 'overfished'. This study used 45 fish stocks from MSC certified fisheries and used internationally accepted methods for determining 'overfishing' ocurred. The results show that none of the examined stock was overfished.
Research detail

Rebuttal to Froese and Proelss ''Evaluation and legal assessment of certified seafood''

Empirical study
Journal article

Published 14th August 2012 by Elsevier. Authored by Stern-Pirlot, A., Smith, A. D. M., Zimmermann, C., Sainsbury, K., Agnew, D. and Gutierrez, N.

We currently don't have the rights to host this resource on Evidensia.
Users are encouraged to access the resource through the publisher's website.