Responsibility and neglect in global production networks: the uneven significance of codes of conduct in Indonesian factories

The authors use secondary survey data on 192 unionized factories, 52 per cent of which produced apparel or
textiles, 38 per cent of which produced electronics, and 10 per cent of which produced Footwear. They use an ordered logistic regression model (model 1) to explore the effect of codes of conducts on labor prices rights (existence and quality of collective bargaining agreements)

Summary by Evidensia Team

Responsibility and neglect in global production networks: the uneven significance of codes of conduct in Indonesian factories

Empirical study

Journal article

Published 2015 by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Authored by Bartley, T., Egels‐Z and én, N.

We currently don't have the rights to host this resource on Evidensia.

Users are encouraged to access the resource through the publisher's website.

Responsibility and neglect in global production networks: the uneven significance of codes of conduct in Indonesian factories

Research Focus

Region/Country:

Summary

Research detail

Responsibility and neglect in global production networks: the uneven significance of codes of conduct in Indonesian factories

You may also be interested in:

Advancing gender equality through sustainability systems: toolkit and good practices

World Benchmarking Alliance: 90% of world’s 2,000 most influential companies do not meet societal expectations on human rights

Advancing sustainability through supply chain legislation? A policy trilemma

Carrots rather than Sticks: how governance of Voluntary Sustainability Standards affects farmer welfare

Evidensia partners