Do Current Forest Carbon Standards Include Adequate Requirements to Ensure Indigenous Peoples' Rights in REDD Projects?

Briefing or opinion
Descriptive information
Journal article

Published 2013 by Commonwealth Forestry Association. Authored by De La Fuente, T. and Hajjar, R.

Summary

This article examines the extent to which forest carbon standards mitigate against the potential negative social impacts of REDD projects through ensuring the rights of indigenous peoples (IP) are not undermined. The authors use the results of literature review to summarise the negative social impacts that REDD projects can have on indigenous communities, and establish framework to evaluate the policies and measures required to reduce these impacts. They go on to use this framework for the anlysis of forest carbon standards, finding in general, assessment of social impacts and subsequent provision for protection of IP's rights is minimal. Only half of the standards assessed require social impact monitoring throughout project implementation, or require IP's free, prior and informed consent. The authors conclude that REDD projects have the potential to improve livelihoods in forest communities, however the forest carbon standards designed for these projects need to include social principles and social impact monitoring in their methodologies, or collaborate with social forest carbon standards.
Research detail

Do Current Forest Carbon Standards Include Adequate Requirements to Ensure Indigenous Peoples' Rights in REDD Projects?

Briefing or opinion
Descriptive information
Journal article

Published 2013 by Commonwealth Forestry Association. Authored by De La Fuente, T. and Hajjar, R.

We currently don't have the rights to host this resource on Evidensia.
Users are encouraged to access the resource through the publisher's website.
View resource