Do GAP farmers do better than non-GAP farmers?: Pesticide management practices of horticultural farmers in Damnoen Saduak, Thailand

This study investigates the impacts of Thailand's public good agricultural practices (GAP) standard, finding that whilst GAP farmers see increased access to export markets, pesticide management practices do not differ between the two groups.

Summary by Evidensia Team

Do GAP farmers do better than non-GAP farmers?: Pesticide management practices of horticultural farmers in Damnoen Saduak, Thailand

Empirical study

Journal article

Published 2016 by Japanese Society for Tropical Agriculture. Authored by Montano, J., Nawata E. and Panichsakpatana, S.

We currently don't have the rights to host this resource on Evidensia.

Users are encouraged to access the resource through the publisher's website.

Do GAP farmers do better than non-GAP farmers?: Pesticide management practices of horticultural farmers in Damnoen Saduak, Thailand

Research Focus

Region/Country:

Summary

Research detail

Do GAP farmers do better than non-GAP farmers?: Pesticide management practices of horticultural farmers in Damnoen Saduak, Thailand

You may also be interested in:

Blueprints for private investment in ecosystem restoration: Lessons from case studies

High cost of cheap water: The true value of water and freshwater ecosystems to people and planet

Beyond certification: investigating the nexus between compliance with sustainable agriculture standard and livelihood assets of certified smallholder cocoa farmers in Ghana.

FOLU China: Action agenda

Evidensia partners