Evaluating seafood eco-labeling as a mechanism to reduce collateral impacts of fisheries in an ecosystem-based fisheries management context

This paper compares the collateral impacts of MSC-certified fisheries with those of non-certified fisheries, using metrics derived from the literature around ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM), finding a significant difference between some indicators but not all.

Summary by Evidensia Team

Evaluating seafood eco-labeling as a mechanism to reduce collateral impacts of fisheries in an ecosystem-based fisheries management context

Empirical study

Journal article

Published 2016 by Elsevier Ltd. . Authored by Selden, R. L., Valencia, S. R., Larsen, A. E., Cornejo-Donoso, J. and Wasserman, A. A.

We currently don't have the rights to host this resource on Evidensia.

Users are encouraged to access the resource through the publisher's website.

Evaluating seafood eco-labeling as a mechanism to reduce collateral impacts of fisheries in an ecosystem-based fisheries management context

Research Focus

Region/Country:

Summary

Research detail

Evaluating seafood eco-labeling as a mechanism to reduce collateral impacts of fisheries in an ecosystem-based fisheries management context

You may also be interested in:

Multi-tier captive relations in the global value chain of tuna: the case of Fair Trade certification of small-scale tuna fishery in Indonesia

Understanding group capabilities for small-scale tuna fishery certification in Indonesia

Rethinking sustainability of marine fisheries for a fast-changing planet

Climate change risks to marine ecosystems and fisheries

Evidensia partners